#1 - In other news..

KneelB4Zod! wrote:RT‏@RT_com · 9 min.
Post WWII Japan and Germany had joint industries along their shared border - Pakistan PM Khan

https://on.rt.com/9suo

OOOOOOO KAY!

Text part English part German, Kosovo organ harvesting:

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Wann-ist-tot-tot/Das-BRD-Regime-unterstuetzt-offiziell-sogar-Organraeuber-und-organ-harvesting/posting-34357735/show/

with further links, one English here

https://web.archive.org/web/20080319062338/http://byzantinesacredart.com/blog/2008/03/harrowing-truth.html

Thing is, the same is happening here. Police for organised crime gets instruktions not to look deeper. High rank police, lawyers etc. are involved. It's "unhealthy" to tell ...

U gno?

About Kosovo/Albania, use of serbian prisoners for organ harvesting, organ trafficking and their mafia in Germany, German protection of mafia:

Post in a German forum, text part English/German, several Links.

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Wann-ist-tot-tot/Das-BRD-Regime-unterstuetzt-offiziell-sogar-Organraeuber-und-organ-harvesting/posting-34357735/show/




Who else know about it?

This is from last year (found it today), it's German, but I think important to read:

The Exodus of the Money Man

https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Der-Exodus-der-Geldmenschen-4110247.html

one link there:

Survival of the Richest
The wealthy are plotting to leave us behind

https://medium.com/s/futurehuman/survival-of-the-richest-9ef6cddd0cc1


GO???

Majority of Germans would not support the USA militarily

https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Mehrheit-der-Deutschen-wuerde-den-USA-militaerisch-nicht-beistehen-4359916.html

A Comment:

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Mehrheit-der-Deutschen-wuerde-den-USA-militaerisch-nicht-beistehen/Das-Schicksal-von-Nicht-US-Amerikanern-ist-Washington-vollkommen-egal/posting-34267719/show/

The fate of non-US Americans does not matter at all to Washington

To bomb a postwar world order compatible with Western values, the US warlords would press the button. Like the ABM system (RAND: "not simply a shield but an enabler of U.S. action"), NATO expansion and armament (including illegal nuclear weapons in Germany) serve to prepare a nuclear first strike against Russia.
The number of dead non-US Americans plays no role whatsoever in US war plans. With such allies you no longer need enemies. In the 80s the European US vassals were still disturbed by it. Nowadays apparently no more.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

....................

"Victory is Possible
by Colin S. Gray and Keith Payne
...
If American nuclear power is to support U.S. foreign policy objectives, the United States must possess the ability to wage nuclear war rationally.
...
Surely no one can be comfortable with the claim that a strategy that would kill millions of Soviet citizens and would invite a strategic response that could kill tens of millions of U.S. citizens would be politically and morally acceptable. However, it is worth recalling the six guidelines for the use of force provided by the "just war" doctrine of the Catholic Church: Force can be used in a just cause; with a right intent; with a reasonable chance of success; in order that, if successful, its use offers a better future than would have been the case had it not been employed; to a degree proportional to the goals sought, or to the evil combated; and with the determination to sparre noncombatants, when there is a reasonable chance of doing so.
...
Small, preplanned strikes can only be of use if the United States enjoys strategic superiority -- the ability to wage a nuclear war at any level of violence with a reasonable prospect of defeating the Soviet Union and of recovering sufficiently to insure a satisfactory postwar world order.
...
The United States should plan to defeat the Soviet Union and to do so at a cost that would not prohibit U.S. recovery. Washington should identify war aims that in the last resort would contemplate the destruction of Soviet political authority and the emergence of a postwar world order compatible with Western values.
...
Strategists cannot offer painless conflicts or guarantee that their preferred posture and doctrine promise a greatly superior deterrence posture to current American schemes. But, they can claim that an intelligent U.S. offensive strategy, wedded to homeland defenses, should reduce U.S. casualties to approximately 20 million, which should render U.S. strategic threats more credible. If the United States developed the targeting plans and procured the weapons necessary to hold the Soviet political, bureaurcratic, and military leadership at risk, that should serve as the functional equivalent in Soviet perspective of the assured-destruction effect of the late 1960s."
http://home.earthlink.net/~platter/articles/80-summer-payne.html
http://www.heise.de/forum/p-28530638/

"Excerpts From Pentagon's Plan: 'Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival'
...
Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union, and Southwest Asia.

There are three additional aspects to this objective: First, the U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. Second, in the non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role. An effective reconstitution capability is important here, since it implies that a potential rival could not hope to quickly or easily gain a predominant military position in the world.
...
While the United States supports the goal of European integration, we must seek to prevent the emergence of European-only security arrangements which would undermine NATO, particularly the alliance's integrated command structure.
...
access to vital raw materials, primarily Persian Gulf oil;"
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/world/excerpts-from-pentagon-s-plan-prevent-the-re-emergence-of-a-new-rival.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm

“We Could Lose Two Hundred Million People [in a Nuclear War] and Still Have More Than We Had at the Time of the Civil War”
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb580-JCS-chairmans-diary-from-1971-reveals-high-level-deliberations/

"The quasi-governmental Rand corporation describes BMD as "not simply a shield but an enabler of U.S. action."
In journals across the political spectrum, military analysts write approvingly of BMD. In the conservative National Interest, Andrew Bacevich writes, "Missile defense isn't really meant to protect America. It's a tool for global dominance." To Lawrence Kaplan in the liberal New Republic, BMD is "about preserving America's ability to wield power abroad. It's not about defense. It's about offense. And that's exactly why we need it.""
http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/2008080102.htm
http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP181/index2.html



Lee Butler, ehemaliger [former] "Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Strategic Command":
"Even having some sense of what it encompassed, I was shocked to see that in fact it was defined by 12,500 targets in the former Warsaw Pact to be attacked by some 10,000 nuclear weapons, virtually simultaneously in the worst of circumstances, which is what we always assumed.
...
And that is: we escaped the Cold War without a nuclear holocaust by some combination of skill, luck and divine intervention, and I suspect the latter in greatest proportion."
https://www.wagingpeace.org/general-lee-butler-addresses-the-canadian-network-against-nuclear-weapons/

Erstschlagsplan SIOP-3:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070401081613/http://www.nd.edu/~klieber/
Foreign%20Affairs%20article%20documents/2005_SIOP-3.pdf

"The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy
...
If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal -- if any at all. At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left."
http://web.archive.org/web/20060406055430/http://www.foreignaffairs.o
rg/20060301faessay85204/keir-a-lieber-daryl-g-press/the-rise-of-u-s-n
uclear-primacy.html?mode=print

Ted Postol, ehemaliger Berater des US-"Verteidigungs"-ministers,
warnt vor US-Kriegsplänen, "konventionellen" Krieg mit Atomwaffen zu führen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pXPgK9Pld8&t=91m25s

"Putin: US / NATO is irreversibly pushing the world towards nuclear war"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PgSX-WD96Q

"Stationierung neuer US-Atomwaffen in Deutschland" [new nuclear weapons in Germany]
http://web.archive.org/web/20150923231123/http://www.zdf.de/frontal-21/stationierung-neuer-us-atomwaffen-in-deutschland-russland-beklagt-verletzung-des-atomwaffensperrvertrages-40197860.html

............................

NATO in the founding years


https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Die-NATO-in-den-Gruenderjahren-4417723.html

A comment:

"Freedom" through fascism like in Portugal and "security" through Gladio terror

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Die-NATO-in-den-Gruenderjahren/Freiheit-durch-Faschismus-wie-in-Portugal-und-Sicherheit-durch-Gladio-Terror/posting-34478316/show/


">From the history of an alliance that had begun to guarantee Europe's freedom and security<

That's obviously meant to be ironic. The founding member was Portugal, the longest fascist dictatorship, and in NATO fascist terror networks were built up, which carried out terrorist attacks against the civilian population. The fate of non-US Americans was and is completely irrelevant to Washington. The US empire did not free Europe from fascism, but prevented it.



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

..............

"Gladio: Geheimarmeen in Europa"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtUoPRERbXk

"Adenauer und die Sache mit der Verhinderung der Entnazifizierung"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwawHTox1vM

"Seven Decades of Nazi Collaboration: America’s Dirty Little Ukraine Secret"
http://www.thenation.com/blog/179057/seven-decades-nazi-collaboration
-americas-dirty-little-ukraine-secret

"The reasons for the warm American response to Fascism and Nazism that are detailed in these books are explained quite openly in the internal U.S. government planning record. For instance, a 1937 Report of the State Department's European Division described the rise of Fascism as the natural reaction of "the rich and middle classes, in self-defense" when the "dissatisfied masses, with the example of the Russian revolution before them, swing to the Left." Fascism therefore "must succeed or the masses, this time reinforced by the disillusioned middle classes, will again turn to the Left." The Report also noted that "if Fascism cannot succeed by persuasion [in Germany], it must succeed by force." It concluded that "economic appeasement should prove the surest route to world peace," a conclusion based on the belief that Fascism as a system was compatible with U.S. interests.
...
Furthermore, although Hitler's rhetorical commitments and actions were completely public, internal U.S. government documents from the 1930s refer to him as a "moderate." For example, the American chargé d'affaires in Berlin wrote to Washington in 1933 that the hope for Germany lay in "the more moderate section of the [Nazi] party, headed by Hitler himself . . . which appeal[s] to all civilized and reasonable people," and seems to have "the upper hand" over the violent fringe. "From the standpoint of stable political conditions, it is perhaps well that Hitler is now in a position to wield unprecedented power," noted the American Ambassador, Frederic Sackett. See Schmitz, The United States and Fascist Italy, 1922-1940,
pp. 140, 174, 133, and ch. 9; Foreign Relations of the United States, 1933, Vol. II ("British Commonwealth, Europe, Near East and Africa"), Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949, pp. 329, 209.

The U.S. reaction to Fascist Italy before the war was similar. A high-level inquiry of the Wilson administration determined in December 1917 that with rising labor militancy, Italy posed "the obvious danger of social revolution and disorganization." A State Department official noted privately that "If we are not careful we will have a second Russia on our hands," adding: "The Italians are like children" and "must be [led] and assisted more than almost any other nation." Mussolini's Blackshirts solved the problem by violence. They carried out "a fine young revolution," the American Ambassador to Italy observed approvingly, referring to Mussolini's March on Rome in October 1922, which brought Italian democracy to an end."
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2004/09/hitler-history-lesson-banagor.html

...............

A fine young revolution - sounds familiar ...

So the USA has supperted fascism from the start and keeps doing this. In principle their private prisons are fascist too.

When US Americans come out of their bubble:

https://www.zodlikeproductions.net/t44p480-random-discussion-fun-off-topic-talks-etc#39555

It's not about politics, but interesting to watch. I have seen one or two of her other vids and must say, this overload of excitement (about a window!!!) is a hardship to watch. I dunno if all US Americans are like this.

You're fired ...

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-11/world-america-youre-fired

I hope the EU managers too

Very interesting points about the plans in the former and present crisis regions, Ukraine, Middle East and others. They openly publis it there and every MSM is telling us BS.

German and partwise English:

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Putin-und-Russland-sind-eine-ideale-Vogelscheuche/NATO-EU-Strategiepapiere/posting-28488383/show/
(in the other comments there is more info)

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Luftangriffe-in-Syrien-USA-dokumentieren-ihren-Willen-sich-festzusetzen/Hausaufgabe-fuer-Thomas-Pany/posting-31831176/show/

"Generalstabsoffizier Reinhard Herden, Bereichsleiter für Analysen
und Risikoprognosen des Amtes für Nachrichtenwesen der Bundeswehr,
nach intensivem Gedankenaustausch mit Angehörigen der
US-amerikanischen Military Intelligence Community in einem
offiziellen Organ der Bundeswehr bereits 1996
...
«Das 21. Jahrhundert wird die Ära eines neuen Kolonialismus sein ...
Die Kolonien der Zukunft werden vor allem Ressourcenlieferanten und
Absatzmärkte für die Kolonialmächte sein. ... Die Regierungen der
reichen Staaten werden physische und digitale Sicherheitskorridore
für den Abtransport von Bodenschätzen und den Handel sowie zu
Informationszwecken einrichten und überwachen.»"
http://www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Bundeswehr/woit.html

"General Staff Officer Reinhard Herden, Head of Analysis Division.
and risk forecasts of the Federal Armed Forces Intelligence Agency,
after an intensive exchange of ideas with relatives of the
US Military Intelligence Community in one
official organ of the Bundeswehr as early as 1996

...

"The 21st century will be the era of a new colonialism ...
The colonies of the future will primarily be suppliers of resources and
be markets for the colonial powers. ... The governments of
physical and digital security corridors will be developed in order to
for the removal of mineral resources and the trade as well as to
and monitor it."
http://www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Bundeswehr/woit.html

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

About a Great Albania (German)

https://deutsch.rt.com/europa/88130-verteidigungsminister-serbiens-warnt-vor-gefahrlichem/

I dunno exactly but think there is a correlation between education and birth rate:

America must establish new standards in "Literacy" that educate everyone on not just reading but understanding the impact of ignorance and manipulation. https://t.co/CO1xJgvMvf

— Robert Young Pelton (@RYP__) May 16, 2019

About "democracy" and constitution in the USA, mainly English text with several interesting links, especially US citizens should know it:

https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Viele-Amerikaner-misstrauen-dem-Wahlsystem-und-dem-ganzen-politischen-System/Das-US-Regime-war-schon-immer-gegen-Demokratie/posting-29405554/show/

German RT:

Policeman confronts gawper with accident victim: "You wanted to see dead!"

https://deutsch.rt.com/kurzclips/88404-polizist-konfrontiert-gaffer-mit-unfallleiche/

About the political cooperation of US- and German elites after WW2 (English):

"Seeds of Destruction"

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015004266956;view=1up;seq=19;size=125

Published 1954, but I've read a few pages, it seem to be interesting for these days to understand the role of Germany today.

Anon wrote:The preachers getting rich from poor Americans

https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-47675301

Preachers always got and get rich from the poor, from whom else? But now especially in USA, because the people get filled with fear by the elites.

Because he wanted to go to prison a 62 years old cardriver nearly killed a man on bicycle (German):

https://www.rtl.de/cms/autofahrer-faehrt-radfahrer-um-weil-er-in-den-knast-wollte-4355118.html